Bengo’s Latest News Clips 2013.04.01
1.
Building on 'BRICS':
The next emerging economies
CNN March 27, 2013
|
BRICS leaders
(From L) India Prime minister Manmohan Singh, President of the People's
Republic of China Xi Jinping, South Africa's President Jacob Zuma, Brazil's
President Dilma Rousseff and Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, pose
for a family photo in Durban.
(CNN) -- As leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, China
and South Africa convene in Durban, the term "BRICS" used to describe
these rapidly growing economies is so last year; today everyone is talking
about the "CIVETS."
Made up of Colombia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Egypt, Turkey
and South Africa -- these nations, some with sizable populations and others
with a wealth of natural resources, could be the economic boomers of the next
decade, according to John Bowler, director of Country Risk Service at the
Economist Intelligence Unit.
Although unlikely to rival the economic might of India
and China or the resources of Russia and Brazil, this motley crew of emerging
markets make the CIVETS the next band of countries to profit from a shift in
global power.
Bowler highlights oil-rich Indonesia as a growth story
for the next decade in particular. With low levels of public debt and a
population of more than 200 million people, the Southeast Asian nation posted
growth of 6% in 2012, at a time when economic giants such as China and India
slowed.
"Indonesia is a low-cost location so it's attracting
investment that would have previously gone into China but because of wage
demands that investment is going into Indonesia," he said.
Bowler also noted that Egypt has high growth potential
despite trying to secure a critical
$4.8 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund.
The country is mired in political turmoil following the
outbreak of the Arab Spring two years ago, with Egyptian opposition
politician Mohamed ElBaradei
labelling the North African nation a "failed state" as
the country remains divided over controversial President Mohamed Morsy.
"Eventually Egypt will modernize and follow the kind
of path that Turkey has in reconciling its issues in society," Bowler
added.
Other members of the CIVETS -- Colombia, Turkey and
Vietnam -- all saw growth of more than 3% for 2012, according to IMF data,
well above the U.S., U.K., Germany and the debt-ridden "PIGS" of
Europe; Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain.
2.
What has been agreed
in Cyprus?
CNN March 27, 2013
|
(CNN) -- Cyprus
has agreed to a €10 billion ($13B)
European Union bailout after a frantic weekend of negotiations
with European lenders, preventing the collapse of the island nation's financial
sector in a deal that will likely mean huge losses for holders of large
deposits at Cyprus' two biggest banks.
What are the terms of the deal?
Cyprus struck a deal with EU officials on a €10 billion
aid package to shore up the country's banking sector. The plan will protect all
deposits of less than €100,000, but is likely to impose a levy or "haircut"
for account holders with more than €100,000 at the two biggest banks -- the
Bank of Cyprus and Popular Bank of Cyprus -- according to CNN
Money.
Popular Bank will be broken up immediately, and its
viable assets will be integrated into the Bank of Cyprus. While the exact
percentage of the "haircut" has not yet been determined, the levy on
Popular Bank depositors alone will raise about €4.2 billion ($5.5B) towards the
bailout deal, while shareholders and bondholders are likely to be wiped out.
As part of the program, Cyprus will also have to raise
taxes on capital gains and companies, introduce structural reforms and
privatize some state assets. It has also agreed to an independent audit of
anti-money laundering efforts in the banking system.
EU officials had originally proposed a package that would
have imposed a levy on all bank accounts in order to raise €5.8 billion ($7.5B)
toward the deal. Account holders with more than €100,000 ($130,000) would have
paid a 9.9% levy and those with smaller deposits 6.75%.
But the Cypriot parliament rejected the bailout offer due
to public outrage over the levy, prompting fears of a run on the country's
banks, which have been closed since March 16, and officials went back to the
drawing board.
3. Elite in China Face Austerity Under Xi’s Rule
The
New York March 27, 2013
BEIJING — Life for the almighty Chinese
government official has come to this: car pools, domestically made wristwatches
and self-serve lunch buffets.
In the four months since he was
anointed China’s paramount leader
and tastemaker-in-chief, President Xi Jinping has imposed a form of
austerity on the nation’s famously free-spending civil servants, military brass
and provincial party bosses. Warning that graft and gluttony threaten to bring
down the ruling Communists, Mr. Xi has ordered an end to boozy,
taxpayer-financed banquets and the bribery that often takes the form of a
gift-wrapped Louis Vuitton bag.
While the power of the nation’s elite remains
unchallenged, the symbols of that power are slipping from view. Gone, for now,
are the freshly cut flowers and red-carpet ceremonies that used to greet
visiting dignitaries. This month, military officers who arrived here for the
annual National People’s Congress were instructed to share hotel rooms and
bring their own toiletries.
“Car-pooling feels so good because it
provides a way to bond and chat with each other while saving money and
increasing efficiency,” one senior military official told the People’s
Liberation Army newspaper.
Not everyone has been so embracing of the
change. Last Tuesday, the country’s top disciplinary body dismissed six
functionaries, including a neighborhood party chief who spent $63,000 to
entertain 80 colleagues at a seaside resort, and a county official who marked
the opening of new administrative offices by throwing a feast for 290 people.
The crackdown appears to be real, as far as
it goes, which may not be very far. After a year of scandal that led to the
toppling of a member of the Politburo, Bo Xilai, and numerous reports of
widespread official corruption, Mr. Xi’s highly public campaign seems aimed at
curtailing the most conspicuous displays of wealth by people in power. He has
done little to tackle the concentrations of money and power in China’s
state-directed economy that have allowed numerous members of the Chinese elite
and their extended families to amass extravagant fortunes.
4. The Sequester Hits the Reservation
The New York Times 2013.03.21
The Congressional Republicans who brought us
the mindless budget cuts known as the sequester have shown remarkable
indifference to life-sustaining government services, American jobs and other
programs. So what do they make of the country’s commitments to American
Indians, its longstanding obligations to tribal governments under the
Constitution and treaties dating back centuries?
Very little, it seems. The sequester will
impose cuts of 5 percent across the Indian Health Service, the modestly
financed agency within the United States Department of Health and Human
Services that provides basic health care to two million American Indians and
native Alaskans. It is underfinanced for its mission and cannot tolerate more
deprivation.
Here lies a little-noticed example of moral
abdication. The biggest federal health and safety-net programs — Social
Security, Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program, Supplemental Security Income, and veterans’
compensation and health benefits — are all exempt from sequestration. But the
Indian Health Service is not.
The agency was supposed to be spared the
worst of the automatic cuts; at least that is what its officials believed.
Under a 1985 law that served as the model for the current sequester, annual
cuts to appropriations for the Indian Health Service could not exceed 2
percent.
Even a cut of that amount is very bad news
for the main health care provider for some of the poorest and sickest Americans,
living in some of the most remote and medically underserved parts of the
country. Like care for veterans, Indian health was supposed to be one area in
which duty and compassion trumped cheapness.
The agency’s officials were braced for that
level of cuts, but they were mistaken. The Office of Management and Budget
interpreted the sequestration law to mean that the 2 percent cap did not apply
to most of the Indian Health Service financing.
沒有留言:
張貼留言