1. Philippines election: Duterte declares victory and promises
change
Controversial
politician weeps at parents’ graves as results show he has unassailable lead,
and vows to change constitution
The Guardian 10 May 2016
The
Philippine politician Rodrigo Duterte, who has an unbeatable lead in unofficial
tallies in the country’s presidential race, will push to rewrite the
constitution and change to a federal system of government, his spokesman has
said.
Speaking
to reporters on Tuesday morning a few hours after Duterte
claimed victory, Peter Lavina said the plan “will require a wide national
consensus beginning with asking congress to call for a constitutional
convention”.
“There
will be major rewriting of our constitution,” he said.
Duterte,
71, had
promised during a foul-mouthed campaign to change from a
centralised system to a federal parliamentary form of government, a policy that
has been popular in provinces far from Manila.
As
mayor for two decades in the southern city of Davao, Duterte
has complained that the capital “gets everything so regions are forced to
beg”.
During
his campaign, Duterte pledged to kill tens of thousands of criminals and joked
about raping an Australian missionary. His campaign symbol is a fist.
Yet
the man who has been labelled “the punisher” displayed a more reflective side
of his character at about 3am on Tuesday shortly after results made it clear he
had won, as he drove to a cemetery and wept at his parents’ graves.
“Help
me Mom,” he said as he sobbed in front of cameras. “I’m just a nobody.” He
later told reporters he would “behave” as president.
Rodrigo
Duterte weeps as he visits his parents’ graves after claiming victory in the
country’s election.
Lavina
said policies Duterte imposed in Davao could be implemented nationwide,
including a late-night drinking ban and a curfew for unescorted minors after
10pm.
“This
liquor ban is because we have to work the next day,” he said. “Nothing to do
with denying us of our freedoms.
“Incidentally,
we have a ban on loud karaoke [in Davao] because everyone has to go to bed.”
Lavina
added that although Duterte could use an executive order, it would be best done
through a consultative “democratic process of legislating these measures”.
A
preliminary ballot count by the accredited election commission showed Duterte
has close to 39% of counted votes. The unofficial results suggest the
tough-talking mayor, who has pledged to kill criminals en masse during his
six-year term, will win when the official tally is announced.
2. How
Hillary Clinton Will Fight Donald Trump’s Unpredictability
Time
May 12, 2016
Donald
Trump lurches in unexpected but effective ways. As a businessman, his
unpredictability left rivals scratching their heads, and checking their
wallets. After 11 months of mounting campaign-trail success in the face of more
than $100 million in negative advertising, a hostile GOP Establishment and a
skeptical media, those same tactics have Hillary Clinton’s supporters wondering
what, exactly, can work against his kind of political insurgency.
Now
some opponents in both parties have concluded that Trump represents a kind of
political asymmetric threat: less equipped, unpredictable and remarkably
resilient. And as others have learned in the worlds of business, technology and
national security, it takes a different kind of strategy to defeat that kind of
unpredictable disrupter.
“There is definitely an
asymmetric political battle here,” says Tim Miller, Jeb Bush’s former
communications director and an adviser to the #NeverTrump super PAC Our
Principles Project. “He’s not playing by the same rules and it’s limiting.”
To
be sure, Trump has provided Clinton with a bounty of potential attacks: his statements
about Mexican immigrants, his comments about women and his routine shifts on
policy will all be fodder in the months to come. But Trump’s opponents in the
Republican primary were unable to make headway with similar material.
Florida
Senator Marco Rubio made fun of the size of Trump’s hands, only to be
criticized for being distasteful. Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson tried to
ignore him, refusing to engage even when Trump compared him to a child
molester. He’s now working for the Trump campaign. Texas Senator Ted Cruz held
off criticizing Trump for months and ended up looking desperate when he
started. Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, the lone Republican woman in
the race,scored a direct hit on Trump’s remarks on women, but it didn’t help her
in the polls. And former Florida governor Jeb Bush pitched himself as the
policy-focused adult in the race only to be trounced.
Taken
together, the GOP has provided Clinton a playbook of things not to do: don’t
stoop to Trump’s level, don’t ignore him until it’s too late, don’t merely call
him sexist, don’t trust in policy above personality.
“Trump seems like a
boorish insult comic, but he is actually incredibly disciplined about driving a
single specific contrast narrative: Cruz is dishonest, Jeb is weak, Rubio isn’t
up to the job,” says Dan Pfeiffer, a former senior adviser and message maven to
President Obama. “The Clinton campaign and larger Democratic infrastructure
needs to settle on a similar narrative and hammer it as relentlessly.”
Hillary
Clinton has so far resisted the urge to jump into the fray. When Trump charged
that she “enabled” Bill Clinton’s infidelity, she let the line slide and
instead pivoted to hammer him for refusing so far to release his tax records.
“When you run for President, especially when you become the nominee, that is
kind of expected. My husband and I have released 33 years of tax returns,”
Clinton told a crowd in Blackwood, N.J. “We’ve got eight years on our website
right now. So you have got to ask yourself: Why doesn’t he want to release
them? Yeah, well, we’re going to find out.”
In
traditional campaigns, communications teams develop message plans and calendars
to systematically relate their agenda to voters — and to sync up with
advertising buttressing the themes. But running against Trump there is no “jobs
week.” Rather, every day threatens to be dominated by whatever new insult or
attack the former reality-television star dreams up. “A constantly reacting
campaign is a losing one,” one Clinton ally says. “If you’re responding knee
jerk, you’re going to need knee-replacement surgery by November.”
Clinton’s
advisers are keeping their heads down and continuing with a plan that pitches
Clinton as the sober, qualified candidate with concrete — if wonkish —
proposals to address specific problems. They know it’s not in Clinton DNA to
out-Trump her fellow New Yorker, and that she will never be the draw that Trump
is for his raucous rallies. Instead, they’re leaving most of the attack work to
surrogates — numerous and dispensable — and urging Clinton herself to keep
focused on what she’s good at: policy.
The
overarching question this November will be whether voters want a political
professional, or a newcomer whose ego matches the nation’s mood.
“Hillary is not good at
the witty remark. She’s not good at the charming attack,” Miller says. “That’s
not her strength. But she will be able to passionately attack him on issues her
supporters care about. Her campaign is going to have to find ways to keep those
issues in the news and not the others that Trump brings up.”
One
strategy that Clinton may end up using a lot is letting Trump speak for
himself. On Cinco de Mayo, the real estate mogul tweeted a photo of himself
eating a taco salad, saying that he loves “Hispanics” (the holiday is actually
of Mexican origin) and bragging about the grill at the Trump Tower. Clinton
responded with a tweet that contrasted his taco salad with a statement he made
just a day earlier: “They’re gonna be deported.” More than 6,000 people
retweeted her.
It’s
one of the lessons that people in business and the military learned long ago.
If you want to defeat a disruptor, you have to become more like them.
3.
Exclusive: London Mayor Sadiq Khan on Religious Extremism,
Brexit and Donald Trump
Time
May 9, 2016
"If Donald Trump becomes the President, I’ll be
stopped from going there by virtue of my faith"
Sadiq
Khan, 45, was declared
the new mayor of London in the early hours of Saturday, becoming the
most powerful Muslim politician in Europe. A Transport Minister in the Labour
government of former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Khan came
under severe attack during the campaign from his Conservative
opponent, Zac Goldsmith, for sharing platforms with extremists during his
earlier career as a human-rights lawyer.
Fresh
from his victory, Khan sat down with TIME on Sunday in his new office in City
Hall, a bulbous glass building overlooking Tower Bridge. In these excerpts from
the conversation, Khan claims he is the “antidote” to extremism, reveals that
the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency might force him to meet U.S. mayors
before the end of the year, and explains why he’s campaigning to keep the U.K.
in the European Union ahead of June’s In/Out referendum.
You’re the first Muslim mayor of a major western city. Do you feel an
extra responsibility to tackle religious extremism?
One of the things that’s important to me as a Londoner is making sure my family, people I care about, are safe. But clearly, being someone who is a Muslim brings with it experiences that I can use in relation to dealing with extremists and those who want to blow us up. And so it’s really important that I use my experiences to defeat radicalization and extremism. What I think the election showed was that actually there is no clash of civilization between Islam and the West. I am the West, I am a Londoner, I’m British, I’m of Islamic faith, Asian origin, Pakistan heritage, so whether it’s [ISIS] or these others who want to destroy our way of life and talk about the West, they’re talking about me. What better antidote to the hatred they spew than someone like me being in this position?
One of the things that’s important to me as a Londoner is making sure my family, people I care about, are safe. But clearly, being someone who is a Muslim brings with it experiences that I can use in relation to dealing with extremists and those who want to blow us up. And so it’s really important that I use my experiences to defeat radicalization and extremism. What I think the election showed was that actually there is no clash of civilization between Islam and the West. I am the West, I am a Londoner, I’m British, I’m of Islamic faith, Asian origin, Pakistan heritage, so whether it’s [ISIS] or these others who want to destroy our way of life and talk about the West, they’re talking about me. What better antidote to the hatred they spew than someone like me being in this position?
How do you win around impressionable young Muslims who could be lured
into extremism?
You say to youngsters you can be British, Muslim and successful. You point to successful British role models. The biggest export we’ve got is [former One Direction singer] Zayn Malik. The most successful British sports person ever is Mohamed Farah, a double Olympic champion and a world-record holder. Who won the Great British Bake Off? Nadiya Hussain. We can point to, when we speak to young Brits of Islamic faith, successful role models. You can go in to business, you can go in to medicine, you can go to politics, dare I say it. So, when somebody comes along and tries to brainwash them with a sort of nihilistic view of life and say the way to get success in this world and the hereafter is to get a Kalashnikov and go to commit — in inverted commas — jihad is to say, “you know what? That’s not true.”
You say to youngsters you can be British, Muslim and successful. You point to successful British role models. The biggest export we’ve got is [former One Direction singer] Zayn Malik. The most successful British sports person ever is Mohamed Farah, a double Olympic champion and a world-record holder. Who won the Great British Bake Off? Nadiya Hussain. We can point to, when we speak to young Brits of Islamic faith, successful role models. You can go in to business, you can go in to medicine, you can go to politics, dare I say it. So, when somebody comes along and tries to brainwash them with a sort of nihilistic view of life and say the way to get success in this world and the hereafter is to get a Kalashnikov and go to commit — in inverted commas — jihad is to say, “you know what? That’s not true.”
The Conservatives linked
you to extremists in what has been viewed as one of the most vicious
campaigns ever waged in the U.K. How did that feel?
My experience in relation to taking on the preachers of hate was saying to them it’s compatible being British, being Western, being Muslim. I’ve experienced the receiving end of this extremism, whether it’s the extremists campaigning against me when I stood for Parliament in 2005 and 2010 and 2015, saying somehow it was haram — sinful — to vote, let alone to stand for Parliament. I’ve been on the receiving end of a fatwa when fighting for equality in relation to same sex marriage [in 2013], so I understand what that’s like.
My experience in relation to taking on the preachers of hate was saying to them it’s compatible being British, being Western, being Muslim. I’ve experienced the receiving end of this extremism, whether it’s the extremists campaigning against me when I stood for Parliament in 2005 and 2010 and 2015, saying somehow it was haram — sinful — to vote, let alone to stand for Parliament. I’ve been on the receiving end of a fatwa when fighting for equality in relation to same sex marriage [in 2013], so I understand what that’s like.
Do you think London’s reputation has been damaged by such a divisive
campaign?
London chose to come out in record numbers, the highest turnout there’s ever been in a mayoral election, and — I say this not with arrogance it is what others have said — the single biggest mandate a British politician has ever received. That shows what a wonderful city we are. We’re not simply tolerating each other — you tolerate a toothache, I don’t want to be tolerated. We respect, we embrace, and we celebrate, which is fantastic.
London chose to come out in record numbers, the highest turnout there’s ever been in a mayoral election, and — I say this not with arrogance it is what others have said — the single biggest mandate a British politician has ever received. That shows what a wonderful city we are. We’re not simply tolerating each other — you tolerate a toothache, I don’t want to be tolerated. We respect, we embrace, and we celebrate, which is fantastic.
You accused the Conservatives of using a “Donald Trump playbook.” What’s
your view on a potential Trump presidency given his remarks on Muslims?
Clearly [I’ll visit] before January in case Donald Trump wins … Hope, I think, is a good way of persuading people to vote for you, energize and enthuse people. I think to try and look for differences, to try and turn communities against each other is not conducive to living successfully and amicably.
Clearly [I’ll visit] before January in case Donald Trump wins … Hope, I think, is a good way of persuading people to vote for you, energize and enthuse people. I think to try and look for differences, to try and turn communities against each other is not conducive to living successfully and amicably.
I
think Bill de Blasio is doing interesting housing stuff in New York, Rahm
Emanuel is doing interesting stuff with the infrastructure bank in Chicago. I
want to go to America to meet with and engage with American mayors. If Donald
Trump becomes the President, I’ll be stopped from going there by virtue of my
faith, which means I can’t engage with American mayors and swap ideas.
Conservative tacticians thought those sorts of tactics would win London and
they were wrong. I’m confident that Donald Trump’s approach to politics won’t
win in America.
Update, May 10: After this interview was published, Trump suggested Khan
would be exempt from any prohibitions on Muslims entering the U.S. “There are
always exceptions,” he told
the New York Times. “I think [his election] is a very good thing, and I
hope he does a very good job … If he does a good job and frankly if he does a
great job, that would be a terrific thing.”
What would happen to London’s position as one of the world’s leading
financial centers if the U.K. voted to leave the European Union?
I think leaving the European Union would be catastrophic for our city. The E.U’s GDP is bigger than China, is bigger than the U.S. We’ve got a market of 500 million people in the European Union. They’re not just a market, they’re our cousins. If you look at London, there are huge social benefits, huge cultural benefits, huge benefits to our security, but the economic benefits are massive. More than half a million jobs in London are directly dependent on the E.U. Sixty percent of the world’s leading companies, including Sony, AIG insurance, China Telecom, have their E.U. headquarters here in London. Half of London’s exports go to the European Union. I’m going to be a Labour mayor campaigning with a Conservative Prime Minister for us to remain in the European Union. It’s crucial going forward.
I think leaving the European Union would be catastrophic for our city. The E.U’s GDP is bigger than China, is bigger than the U.S. We’ve got a market of 500 million people in the European Union. They’re not just a market, they’re our cousins. If you look at London, there are huge social benefits, huge cultural benefits, huge benefits to our security, but the economic benefits are massive. More than half a million jobs in London are directly dependent on the E.U. Sixty percent of the world’s leading companies, including Sony, AIG insurance, China Telecom, have their E.U. headquarters here in London. Half of London’s exports go to the European Union. I’m going to be a Labour mayor campaigning with a Conservative Prime Minister for us to remain in the European Union. It’s crucial going forward.
沒有留言:
張貼留言